Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 81: Line 81:  
::I have to agree with [[User:Order]]'s assessment.  I mean, are people just making these up?  That doesn't sound very useful, and it certainly undermines Conservapedia's usefulness as a source!  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 13:44, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::I have to agree with [[User:Order]]'s assessment.  I mean, are people just making these up?  That doesn't sound very useful, and it certainly undermines Conservapedia's usefulness as a source!  [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 13:44, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Why can't we have people self-identify? I know Richard tried this at one point and got into some hot water (which I won't expand on)but the underlying principle was valid--if this wiki is supposed to contain only conservative content how can we not ask people to tell us the truth about where their allegiance lies? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Why can't we have people self-identify? I know Richard tried this at one point and got into some hot water (which I won't expand on)but the underlying principle was valid--if this wiki is supposed to contain only conservative content how can we not ask people to tell us the truth about where their allegiance lies? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::Self-identifying won't work, especially not on this site. Andy and his crew are so conservative that almost everyone is a liberal to them (if you don't believe me, look at Andy's posts and how everyone who disagrees with him is labeled a liberal). In most circles I'd be considered a conservative, but here I'm nothing but a dirty liberal hippie (and that's a good thing as I'd rather not be grouped with some of the wingnuts here). [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:03, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== A new term coined by Conservapedia? ==
 
== A new term coined by Conservapedia? ==
852

edits

Navigation menu