408
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 45:
Line 45: − − − − == Conservapedos – Did you know? == − − (Not so fast Scotty!) − − The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists. − − Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.) − − Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them. − − Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him! − − Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site! − − Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’! − − − − − == Conservapedos – Did you know? == − − (Not so fast Scotty!) − − The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists. − − Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.) − − Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them. − − Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him! − − Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site! − − Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’! − − − − − − − − == Conservapedos – Did you know? == − − (Not so fast Scotty!) − − The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists. − − Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.) − − Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them. − − Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him! − − Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site! − − Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’!
Reverted edits by MMitchJ (talk) to last revision by ScottDG
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)