SkipCaptcha
185
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − parodist+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Undo revision 956680 by SStUpiDWiKki (talk)
[[File:Chopping down evolutionary belief.jpg|thumbnail|175px|right|[[Question evolution! campaign]] ]]
An advocate of the [[Question evolution! campaign]] wrote:
"We have some great news to report! A person who loves the [http://creation.com/question-evolution Question evolution! campaign] has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his [[Question evolution! campaign|Question evolution!]] axe at the rotten tree of [[evolution|evolutionism]] and nothing is going to distract him.
We already know that the evolutionists are impotent against the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer] so the widespread distribution of these questions is going to be very demoralizing to evolution supporters. Questioning, [[Critical thinking|critical reasoning]] and open inquiry are toxic to evolutionary belief so we are very much looking forward to the widespread dissemination of the Question evolution! campaign."[http://shockawenow.blogspot.com/2011/10/question-evolution-campaign-axman.html]
See: [[Enthusiastic responses to the Question evolution! campaign|Responses to the Question evolution! campaign]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:19, 20 October 2011 (EDT)
== Gingrich ==
Please show what I have added is incorrect before deleting. Thank you. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 21:31, 22 January 2012 (EST)
==Personnal Life==
I've seen that you reverted the personal life info added for [[Newt Gingrich]] because of "Gossip". Don't you think we should also remove all the gossip on democrats page as well? See [[Barack Hussein Obama#Early life]] or [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]] or [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]] or [[Hillary_Clinton#Reaction_to_Monica_Lewinsky_scandal]] ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:32, 22 January 2012 (EST)
:nope. Because liberals. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 21:36, 22 January 2012 (EST)
::Is it supposed to be a joke ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:37, 22 January 2012 (EST)
:::I think he means that liberals often have issues about their personal lives ignored or defended by the media, so we often have to make out by covering info that isn't often seen. For conservatives, the media tends to constantly attack and bring up gossip. I'm not saying that Gingrich's personal life should not be covered here, but I don't think we should elaborate it to a great degree as it is not that relevant to his actual candidacy. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:00, 22 January 2012 (EST)
Nope. I mean that on Conservapedia, "liberals" is as much justification as you need to make any edit. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 23:02, 22 January 2012 (EST)
::::Scott, you do know that you just outed yourself as a Poe, right? No actual conservative on CP would say something so honest. [[User:RolandW|RolandW]] 23:55, 22 January 2012 (EST)
:::::Scott may be a centrist, leaning left. We don't block based on ideology, though the number of liberals who get blocked on this site is far more than the number of conservatives, due to the fact that liberals tend to be more trollish and disruptive. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:03, 25 January 2012 (EST)