161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 16:06, January 26, 2012
, 16:06, January 26, 2012Added item 27
:::ii) It must be considered that at the time when the Gospels were written, neither their authors nor their intended readers were aware of any concept of the speed of light and were unable to measure the billionths of a second difference between the events being considered here. Thus just as in modern parlance the phrase 'at the same moment' has a tolerance of milliseconds (unless specifically couched to mean otherwise) so do the various terms used by the Evangelists. They would never have considered it an important issue, and would therefore not have worried about the degree of precision.
:::ii) It must be considered that at the time when the Gospels were written, neither their authors nor their intended readers were aware of any concept of the speed of light and were unable to measure the billionths of a second difference between the events being considered here. Thus just as in modern parlance the phrase 'at the same moment' has a tolerance of milliseconds (unless specifically couched to mean otherwise) so do the various terms used by the Evangelists. They would never have considered it an important issue, and would therefore not have worried about the degree of precision.
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
20:
21:
22:
23:
24:
25:
26:
27: ''Relativity requires different values for the inertia of a moving object: in its direction of motion, and perpendicular to that direction. This contradicts the logical principle that the laws of physics are the same in all directions.''
:This is merely a restatement of item 10, (see above).
== References ==
== References ==