19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: + + + +
Talk:Deliberate ignorance (view source)
Revision as of 13:39, January 28, 2012
, 13:39, January 28, 2012→Application To Delete the Entire Article
::All this article does is call people the author doesnt like names. I suspect if I started posting other examples of deliberate ignorance, I'd get in trouble unless they were of people the author disliked. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 00:40, 18 May 2011 (EDT)
::All this article does is call people the author doesnt like names. I suspect if I started posting other examples of deliberate ignorance, I'd get in trouble unless they were of people the author disliked. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 00:40, 18 May 2011 (EDT)
== Hypocrisy ==
This article is hypocritical. "Believing that only one ideology could ever make mistakes; constantly demonizing that ideology while ignoring the faults of one's own..." What if the "one ideology" that "could ever make mistakes" is liberalism? This seems to be the overall perspective of Conservapedia; is Conservapedia guilty of deliberate ignorance? --X. Dulks
== Un-American content ==
== Un-American content ==