13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + − Unlike most essay pages, anyone is welcome to contribute. We ask that you abide by the usual guidelines—do not remove non-vandal, non-parody, non-libelous material without discussing it first on the talk page, or explaining after-the-fact for serious problems. − + −
Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 03:14, January 29, 2012
, 03:14, January 29, 2012no edit summary
This is intended as an article rebutting the points in the [[Counterexamples to Relativity]] article. That article's talk page has proven to be less than satisfactory for this purpose, because it gets archived, and much of its material has degenerated into personal disputes. We believe that the two sides of the issue are better handled in two articles—this one and [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], rather than a talk page.
This [[Media:
----
Example.ogg{{Template}}]]as proven to be less than satisfactory for this purpose, because it gets archived, and much of its material has degeneratlems.
1: ''Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found. Sound
1: ''Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found. Sound like global warming?''
:This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist.
:This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist.