239
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 217:
Line 217: +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 19:43, April 9, 2007
, 19:43, April 9, 2007→What's this article trying to achieve?
:::::::Additional topic for study for Phillip: Judaism. 12:53, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::Additional topic for study for Phillip: Judaism. 12:53, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Thanks for the non-answer. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:40, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Thanks for the non-answer. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:40, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::Oh, it's most definitely an answer. A bit cryptic perhaps, but surely someone gifted in exegesis should be able to pluck the meaning out of the chasm of calypsis. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 15:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Petrus' comment of 05:51, 8 April 2007 (EDT) shows but one example of Philip's illogic. Another example would be this sentence, "But why not also hypothesise that Jesus didn't exist, or that the Bible was written by Shakespeare or something?" This is an absurd extrapolation that has no basis in what I said, and as such is an illogical response. Also Philip, while I'm sure you're unaware of this, you should know that for nearly two millenia there have been raging debates within the Chistian community regarding to what extent and where Jesus can use his "supernaural" powers. For example -- for the crucifxion to be a valid sacrifice leading to salvation, Jesus must be all man during that period. Also, early Christianity were beset with a variety of "heresies" (litteraly "schools of thought) that, had they been adopted, would have profoundly changed your current beliefs. See ''Donatism, Manichaeism, Gnosticism, Marcionism, Montanism'' and ''Docetism''. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 07:18, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Petrus' comment of 05:51, 8 April 2007 (EDT) shows but one example of Philip's illogic. Another example would be this sentence, "But why not also hypothesise that Jesus didn't exist, or that the Bible was written by Shakespeare or something?" This is an absurd extrapolation that has no basis in what I said, and as such is an illogical response. Also Philip, while I'm sure you're unaware of this, you should know that for nearly two millenia there have been raging debates within the Chistian community regarding to what extent and where Jesus can use his "supernaural" powers. For example -- for the crucifxion to be a valid sacrifice leading to salvation, Jesus must be all man during that period. Also, early Christianity were beset with a variety of "heresies" (litteraly "schools of thought) that, had they been adopted, would have profoundly changed your current beliefs. See ''Donatism, Manichaeism, Gnosticism, Marcionism, Montanism'' and ''Docetism''. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 07:18, 8 April 2007 (EDT)