181
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 337:
Line 337: + + +
Talk:United States presidential election, 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 05:34, February 9, 2012
, 05:34, February 9, 2012no edit summary
Shouldn't we reorganize the Ranking by Likelihood of Winning Republican Nomination ? I believe Jeb Bush and Sarah Palin do have less chances to win than Ron Paul or Rick Santorum. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:33, 5 February 2012 (EST)
Shouldn't we reorganize the Ranking by Likelihood of Winning Republican Nomination ? I believe Jeb Bush and Sarah Palin do have less chances to win than Ron Paul or Rick Santorum. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:33, 5 February 2012 (EST)
:What about moving info about Republican candidates to [[2012 Republican Primaries]] ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:44, 5 February 2012 (EST)
:What about moving info about Republican candidates to [[2012 Republican Primaries]] ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:44, 5 February 2012 (EST)
==Predictions: Andy Schlafly vs. Andy Schlafly==
There's seems to be two users on this site both named Aschlafly. Both Aschlafly's like making [[Presidential election 2012|presidential election predictions]]. But they can't seem to agree with each other. One says it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959694&oldid=959693| Jeb Bush]. The other thinks it's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=943924&oldid=943593| Newt]. One predicted [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&action=historysubmit&diff=938684&oldid=938671| Sarah Palin] wouldn't run. Meanwhile, the other ranks her [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&action=historysubmit&diff=959693&oldid=959011| fourth in line for the nomination]. So which Andy Schlafly should we be listening to? And is it possible that they ''both'' might be wrong? --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 00:34, 9 February 2012 (EST)