4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 135:
Line 135: + +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 23:37, February 9, 2012
, 23:37, February 9, 2012→What an evolutionist would say
What we see as "designed" structures and organs are in fact the result of an evolutionary process, without any kind of plan or input besides the environment killing off any variants that don't confer enough of a reproductive advantage.[[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 16:17, 12 January 2012 (EST)
What we see as "designed" structures and organs are in fact the result of an evolutionary process, without any kind of plan or input besides the environment killing off any variants that don't confer enough of a reproductive advantage.[[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 16:17, 12 January 2012 (EST)
::Who cares? The potential existence of a designer doesn't have anything to do with the potential existence of evolution. The evolutionary mechanisms in question tend to rely on numbers, on the probability that a mutation will happen here, that random mating will pair this chromosome with that, that genetic drift will change one allele percentage to another. If these numbers are driven by an almighty force, it doesn't change the mechanisms themselves. As far as I'm concerned, this question is thus irrelevant to the debate. [[User:PabloAbra|PabloAbra]] 18:38, 9 February 2012
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===