Changes

::After your comment I reread the [[rules]] and I can’t see how you can say copying is not against them.  Commandment number 1 reads “Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from [[Wikipedia]] or other non-public domain sources.” I can’t read this to mean anything other than that copying from non-public domain sources, like the Des Moines Register, is against the rules.  (Further I think at the article stands it is in violation of commandment number 2 “Always cite and give credit to your sources,[1] even if in the public domain. Please see Conservapedia's [[Manual of Style]] which assists new [[wiki]] users on how to put footnotes in an article.” Since the direct quotes are not marked as quotations and it is not clear where they are taken from).   

::After your comment I reread the [[rules]] and I can’t see how you can say copying is not against them.  Commandment number 1 reads “Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from [[Wikipedia]] or other non-public domain sources.” I can’t read this to mean anything other than that copying from non-public domain sources, like the Des Moines Register, is against the rules.  (Further I think at the article stands it is in violation of commandment number 2 “Always cite and give credit to your sources,[1] even if in the public domain. Please see Conservapedia's [[Manual of Style]] which assists new [[wiki]] users on how to put footnotes in an article.” Since the direct quotes are not marked as quotations and it is not clear where they are taken from).   

::I can’t see how, after reading those Comandments, you can argue that copying from a non public domain source and then not marking the direct quotes with quotation marks and then not citing exactly where the direct quotes were taken from is not in violation of the stated rules of Conservapedia.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT)   

::I can’t see how, after reading those Comandments, you can argue that copying from a non public domain source and then not marking the direct quotes with quotation marks and then not citing exactly where the direct quotes were taken from is not in violation of the stated rules of Conservapedia.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT)   

*Wasn't my add.  So, I take it this is once again the disrupting squad here to point out flaws and discredit, but never fix anything? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 18:04, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

*Wasn't my add.  So, I take it this is once again the disrupting squad here to point out flaws and discredit, but never fix anything? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 18:04, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Zach_Johnson&diff=94255&oldid=94229 Yes, it was.] The edit shows that YOU added the info. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:08, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

How are we going to fix something on a locked page? are you saying you will unlock the page so that we can remove the copyright material? At the moment, you are tell us to put out the fire across the street while you have us locked in a jallcell. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 18:06, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

How are we going to fix something on a locked page? are you saying you will unlock the page so that we can remove the copyright material? At the moment, you are tell us to put out the fire across the street while you have us locked in a jallcell. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 18:06, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

*Well, look closer.  Someone added to my original. The page is unlocked. Please make sure you improve it, and not strip it bare....that might be considered sabotage. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 18:13, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

==References==

==References==

<references/>

<references/>