1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: − + + +
→References
:The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution. Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article. I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here. Please feel free to refer to [[Basic Evolutionary Theory]]. Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution. Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article. I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here. Please feel free to refer to [[Talk:Basic Evolutionary Theory]]. Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Well, Conservative has once again taken it upon himself to delete an entire article comprising hours of work. I have corrected my link above, as he has moved it to the talk page, however the talk page is no longer connected to an article.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:58, 9 April 2007 (EDT)