Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
::The article shouldn't really mention our opinion of quality at all, just what the ratings and reception of the audience says. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 20:52, 19 February 2012 (EST)
 
::The article shouldn't really mention our opinion of quality at all, just what the ratings and reception of the audience says. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 20:52, 19 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::Not when their politically correct stances hinder the quality of their show. Did you see last night's episode where they got their kicks from mocking [[Bill O'Reilly]]?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:59, 19 February 2012 (EST)
 
:::Not when their politically correct stances hinder the quality of their show. Did you see last night's episode where they got their kicks from mocking [[Bill O'Reilly]]?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:59, 19 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::::And how does that necessarily hinder the quality of the show? Judging by ratings and what the overall public thought, the quality of the show is still very good. The quality of the show really shouldn't be said in the article at all, as it's meant to be objective and factual, not our opinion. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 21:05, 19 February 2012 (EST)
126

edits

Navigation menu