126
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
Talk:Saturday Night Live (view source)
Revision as of 02:16, February 20, 2012
, 02:16, February 20, 2012no edit summary
::::And how does that necessarily hinder the quality of the show? Judging by ratings and what the overall public thought, the quality of the show is still very good. The quality of the show really shouldn't be said in the article at all, as it's meant to be objective and factual, not our opinion. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 21:05, 19 February 2012 (EST)
::::And how does that necessarily hinder the quality of the show? Judging by ratings and what the overall public thought, the quality of the show is still very good. The quality of the show really shouldn't be said in the article at all, as it's meant to be objective and factual, not our opinion. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 21:05, 19 February 2012 (EST)
:::::We shouldn't also censor facts. The facts are that SNL (much like many other comedy venues) have come to appreciate a generally leftist stance.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:13, 19 February 2012 (EST)
:::::We shouldn't also censor facts. The facts are that SNL (much like many other comedy venues) have come to appreciate a generally leftist stance.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:13, 19 February 2012 (EST)
::::::That I'll agree with, but we shouldn't imply that the quality has dropped or that the show has objectively gotten less funny. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 21:16, 19 February 2012 (EST)