80
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
→Article changes
:Hi Karajou, thanks for the suggestion. However, changing text that appeared to be personal in nature ("SNL became less funny in the past decade") rather than neutral was exactly what I did and what was reverted by James Wilson. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST)
:Hi Karajou, thanks for the suggestion. However, changing text that appeared to be personal in nature ("SNL became less funny in the past decade") rather than neutral was exactly what I did and what was reverted by James Wilson. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST)
::[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Saturday_Night_Live&diff=962789&oldid=743076 That particular edit] was originally added in by [[User:Aschlafly]], who is the founder of this site. That is why I reverted it.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 15:03, 24 February 2012 (EST)
::[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Saturday_Night_Live&diff=962789&oldid=743076 That particular edit] was originally added in by [[User:Aschlafly]], who is the founder of this site. That is why I reverted it.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 15:03, 24 February 2012 (EST)
:::So if I delete edits done by Aschlafly that clearly violate his own Conservapedia rules, that are (as Karajou puts it) personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral and undermine Conservapedia's credibility, you as Aschlafly's zealous servant will still revert my action? Peculiar behavior... What you should do of course is judge every single entry by its encyclopedic merits, regardless of who made the entry. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 02:57, 25 February 2012 (EST)