Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:  
:Possible liberal bias--the study of so-called "homomorphisms" in modern liberal algebra could be part of the gay agenda?--[[User:Bogart12|Bogart12]]
 
:Possible liberal bias--the study of so-called "homomorphisms" in modern liberal algebra could be part of the gay agenda?--[[User:Bogart12|Bogart12]]
 
::No, sorry, that's absurd and I think you know it. "Homo" simply means same and is used in a wide variety of contexts that have nothing to do with liberal bias. Is homogenized milk liberal bias? Or homonyms? Homophones? I've already reverted your addition to the article once, so I won't do it again just yet, but please consider removing or modifying it yourself.--[[User:JustinD|JustinD]] 19:32, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 
::No, sorry, that's absurd and I think you know it. "Homo" simply means same and is used in a wide variety of contexts that have nothing to do with liberal bias. Is homogenized milk liberal bias? Or homonyms? Homophones? I've already reverted your addition to the article once, so I won't do it again just yet, but please consider removing or modifying it yourself.--[[User:JustinD|JustinD]] 19:32, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::There is a crucial difference between your examples and my claim.  A homophone describes two words sounding the same but being different.  Bat is not a homophone with bat, that doesn't make sense.  Saying wind and wind are homophones acknowledges that they sound the same but are different words.  A homomorphism allows groups that are different, like Z_2xZ_2 and the Klein four group, to be treated as equal.  Additionally the global warming obsession is prolific.  I didn't mean my writing to sound flippant, and perhaps its tone can be improved, but it was certainly not meant as a joke.
34

edits

Navigation menu