Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
if that were true, then were the costly experiments done if relativists were going to ignore the negative results?
Line 6: Line 6:  
#:This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist.
 
#:This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist.
 
#:It has nothing to do with global warming.
 
#:It has nothing to do with global warming.
 +
:::"This is because the experimental capability to do so doesn't exist." - if that were true, then were the costly experiments done if relativists were going to ignore the negative results?
 
#''The orbital radius of the Moon's orbit is increasing, contrary to what Relativity predicts''.
 
#''The orbital radius of the Moon's orbit is increasing, contrary to what Relativity predicts''.
 
#:This could be a counterexample to both GR and Newtonian gravity--in both, the radius is defined in terms of conserved quantities.  
 
#:This could be a counterexample to both GR and Newtonian gravity--in both, the radius is defined in terms of conserved quantities.  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Navigation menu