Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  23:47, February 26, 2012
Line 16: Line 16:  
== The central components of the debate ==
 
== The central components of the debate ==
   −
The controversies concerning how to understand or define omnipotence in regard to the nature of its relations to other thing are all resolvable in terms of the respective [[ontology|ontologies]] of [[power]], all-ness, and [[logic]]. Since the concept of omnipotence is coherent prior to any task, any task which does not abide the concept is precluded by the concept. Of course, some tasks, as such, are difficult to understand, while others are difficult to rightly understand in the first place.  
+
The controversies concerning how to understand or define omnipotence in regard to the nature of its relations to other things are all resolvable in terms of the respective [[ontology|ontologies]] of [[power]], all-ness, and [[logic]]. Since the concept of omnipotence is coherent prior to any task, any task which does not abide the concept is precluded by the concept. Of course, some tasks, as such, are difficult to understand, while others are difficult to rightly understand in the first place.
−
 
      
== Details of the debate ==
 
== Details of the debate ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568

edits

Navigation menu