Changes

::Good point, but applied math is still math, and the example illustrates liberal use of math to convey an unjustified claim of "proof".--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:10, 26 February 2012 (EST)

::Good point, but applied math is still math, and the example illustrates liberal use of math to convey an unjustified claim of "proof".--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:10, 26 February 2012 (EST)

:::Hammers have been used throughout history for the construction of buildings intended to promote both liberal and conservative ideals. The hammer has no inherent political philosophy. The hammer is a tool, and though it can be used for liberal or conservative purposes, it is inherently a neutral party. Math is the same way. While math can be used to promote liberal ideals, and is often studied by liberals, it is not liberal or conservative. Math is a tool.[[User:KenShomer|KenShomer]] 22:11, 26 February 2012 (EST)

:::Hammers have been used throughout history for the construction of buildings intended to promote both liberal and conservative ideals. The hammer has no inherent political philosophy. The hammer is a tool, and though it can be used for liberal or conservative purposes, it is inherently a neutral party. Math is the same way. While math can be used to promote liberal ideals, and is often studied by liberals, it is not liberal or conservative. Math is a tool.[[User:KenShomer|KenShomer]] 22:11, 26 February 2012 (EST)

== atheist and liberal idiocy extends to math: 2+2=5? (Lawrence Krauss vs William Lane Craig) ==

== atheist and liberal idiocy extends to math: 2+2=5? (Lawrence Krauss vs William Lane Craig) ==

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOrlIOm6eGM 2+2=5? (Lawrence Krauss vs William Lane Craig)] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:33, 26 February 2012 (EST)

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOrlIOm6eGM 2+2=5? (Lawrence Krauss vs William Lane Craig)] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:33, 26 February 2012 (EST)