Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 59: Line 59:  
*'''Premise 2:''' It is possible to demonstrate that high volumes of functionally specific information can be produced by intelligent causes. Intelligence is in fact as of now the only known cause of complex functionality.   
 
*'''Premise 2:''' It is possible to demonstrate that high volumes of functionally specific information can be produced by intelligent causes. Intelligence is in fact as of now the only known cause of complex functionality.   
 
*'''Conclusion:''' From the perspective of known cause-and-effect structure of the world, the intelligent design is the most causally adequate explanation for the origin of the functionally specific information present in an organic cell.<ref name=”SICell”>{{cite book|author=[[Stephen C. Meyer]]|title=Signature in the Cell: DNA and the evidence for Intelligent Design|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=n4iaNwAACAAJ&dq=inauthor:%22Stephen+C.+Meyer%22&hl=en&ei=T_3ZTviXJsOK4gSj4eXMDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=book-thumbnail&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6wEwAA|page=378|quote=But the argument…takes the following form...|publisher=HarperOne|year=2010|accessdate=2011-12-03}}</ref><references/>--[[User:AK|AK]] 21:39, 5 December 2011 (EST)
 
*'''Conclusion:''' From the perspective of known cause-and-effect structure of the world, the intelligent design is the most causally adequate explanation for the origin of the functionally specific information present in an organic cell.<ref name=”SICell”>{{cite book|author=[[Stephen C. Meyer]]|title=Signature in the Cell: DNA and the evidence for Intelligent Design|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=n4iaNwAACAAJ&dq=inauthor:%22Stephen+C.+Meyer%22&hl=en&ei=T_3ZTviXJsOK4gSj4eXMDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=book-thumbnail&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6wEwAA|page=378|quote=But the argument…takes the following form...|publisher=HarperOne|year=2010|accessdate=2011-12-03}}</ref><references/>--[[User:AK|AK]] 21:39, 5 December 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
== Dawkins agnostic ==
 +
 +
Other articles now say that Dawkins is an agnostic, not an atheist. Should this one be amended along similar lines?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:26, 28 February 2012 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613

edits

Navigation menu