Changes

The questions remain: Why did you remove the reference to Bush's pre-2000 anti-nation-building position? Why did you revert a good compromise on how liberals view current foreign policy? And why do you lock an article, but continue editing, which is an abuse of sysop privilege? [[User:Order|Order]] 10 April 10:50 (AEST)

The questions remain: Why did you remove the reference to Bush's pre-2000 anti-nation-building position? Why did you revert a good compromise on how liberals view current foreign policy? And why do you lock an article, but continue editing, which is an abuse of sysop privilege? [[User:Order|Order]] 10 April 10:50 (AEST)

:The isolationist stuff, while on the surface looks like a lame disclaimer for what follows, probably needs reviewing.  However, to maintain isolationism is now, or has been a traditional "liberal" view is somewaht of strech, cause there probably is quite a lengthy record of libs calling for active intervention arounf the world for decades.  This indeed, is why the Iraq is such a milestone.  On the stuff of about human rights & democracy, we may have to look closely at the cases of North & South Vietnam, and some others since that time, as well.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:12, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

:The isolationist stuff, while on the surface looks like a lame disclaimer for what follows, probably needs reviewing.  However, to maintain isolationism is now, or has been a traditional "liberal" view is somewhat of strech, cause there probably is quite a lengthy record of libs calling for active intervention arounf the world for decades.  This indeed, is why the Iraq is such a milestone.  On the stuff of about human rights & democracy, we may have to look closely at the cases of North & South Vietnam, and some others since that time, as well.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:12, 9 April 2007 (EDT)