9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + + + + + + +
Added a question about the polling of doctors on evolution
__TOC__
__TOC__
== Doctors poll results ==
I don't think this poll is appropriate to include. How many doctors have to study evolutionary biology? They don't, it's not relevant to their medical knowledge to have an advanced understanding of evolution.
For what it's worth you might as well say x% of engineers/policemen/politicians accept evolution. These people are all laymen in evolution, they will have the same level of understanding as people on the street. Why not include a poll taken from people who really have to understand evolution for their work, such as geneticists/archaeologists/biologists/etc? That would be far more applicable, don't you agree?
I suggest the poll is either removed as it asks people who are unsuitable to answer the question, or we use a new poll that includes suitable people. I would be more than happy to provide more suitable polls for you to use in your article if you wish :-). --[[User:JeremyK|JeremyK]] 10:33, 29 February 2012 (EST)
== Houston, we have anti-evolutionism campaign lift off ==
== Houston, we have anti-evolutionism campaign lift off ==