| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | |Dec. 26, 2006 | | |Dec. 26, 2006 |
| | |The [[Nobel Prize]] "selection process has become political, as it was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II or to anyone who criticizes the [[theory of evolution]]. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken [[liberal]]s, such as Jimmy Carter."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&oldid=7393</ref> | | |The [[Nobel Prize]] "selection process has become political, as it was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II or to anyone who criticizes the [[theory of evolution]]. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken [[liberal]]s, such as Jimmy Carter."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&oldid=7393</ref> |
| − | |[[Liberal denial]] insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. | + | |[[Liberal denial]] insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Also, Conservapedia did not specifically predict that Obama would win. |
| | |Subsequently the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to [[Barack Obama]] despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with "shock" and "a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability."<ref>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html</ref> | | |Subsequently the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to [[Barack Obama]] despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with "shock" and "a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability."<ref>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html</ref> |
| | |October 2009 | | |October 2009 |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| | |Aug. 18, 2007 | | |Aug. 18, 2007 |
| | |Because [[Jon Stewart]]'s movies "almost always do very badly (critically and financially) people say that there is a "Jon Stewart Curse" that he brings to all his movies." <ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jon_Stewart&oldid=271190</ref> | | |Because [[Jon Stewart]]'s movies "almost always do very badly (critically and financially) people say that there is a "Jon Stewart Curse" that he brings to all his movies." <ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jon_Stewart&oldid=271190</ref> |
| − | |Still remains popular among liberals. His Daily Show has good ratings for basic cable. | + | |Still remains popular among liberals. His ''Daily Show'' has good ratings for basic cable. Saying his movies do bad is not a prediction of how an awards show he hosts will do. |
| | |His subsequent hosting of the Oscars in 2008 set the modern record for its smallest number of viewers, and he has not starred in a movie since Conservapedia's observation in 2007. | | |His subsequent hosting of the Oscars in 2008 set the modern record for its smallest number of viewers, and he has not starred in a movie since Conservapedia's observation in 2007. |
| | |Feb. 24, 2008 | | |Feb. 24, 2008 |
| Line 63: |
Line 63: |
| | |Dec. 22, 2008 | | |Dec. 22, 2008 |
| | |the theory of [[man-made global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227</ref> | | |the theory of [[man-made global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227</ref> |
| − | |"The science is settled" that rapid [[global warming]] is somehow occurring. | + | | Insist there is an overwhelming consensus in scientific community on the issue. They point to data like a survey of 1,372 climate researchers that found 97-98% agreed that anthropogenic climate change was real.<ref>http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html</reF> |
| | |Frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "[[climate change]]." | | |Frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "[[climate change]]." |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |