1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Richard Dawkins and agnosticism (view source)
Revision as of 13:31, March 8, 2012
, 13:31, March 8, 2012→Daily Telegraph Article of Feb 2012.: new section
The 1.4 percent figure you quote is the chance (according to Dawkins) that there is a God, but the 6.9 out of 7 is the chance (according to Dawkins) that there isn't. These two figures should be brought in line with eachother. Either change 1.4 to 98.6 or chance 6.9 to 0.1. The page is protected so I can't edit. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 08:58, 7 March 2012 (EST)
The 1.4 percent figure you quote is the chance (according to Dawkins) that there is a God, but the 6.9 out of 7 is the chance (according to Dawkins) that there isn't. These two figures should be brought in line with eachother. Either change 1.4 to 98.6 or chance 6.9 to 0.1. The page is protected so I can't edit. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 08:58, 7 March 2012 (EST)
:::Thanks, fixed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:15, 7 March 2012 (EST)
:::Thanks, fixed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:15, 7 March 2012 (EST)
== Daily Telegraph Article of Feb 2012. ==
I think the original Daily Telegraph article(and the Daily Mail's report, as well as several other reports on the debate), and the Debate on which the article was reporting, need to be mentioned here strongly in perhaps a new section.
I think it should contain links to the video of the debate debate which can be found on the Telegraph's site and also on youtube.
I think this also should recieve it's own section on the original Richard Dawkins article, and a reference next to where it says Agnostic in the description of him.
Moderator: "So why don't you call yourself Agnostic then?"
Dawkins: "I do!"
Moderator: "But you've been described as 'the worlds most famous Atheist'?"
Dawkins: "Not by me... not by me."(see The God Delusion, for rather a ironic secondary source that confirms that statement!)