Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
184 bytes added ,  16:40, March 8, 2012
m
Ask first; Edit later.
Line 58: Line 58:     
I would say that during the time Giuliani was a viable candidate, Huckabee was not, and this was when Robertson endorsed the former. As for this article being called a smear job, I think it's very good as it is, with just simple, trustworthy ''quotations'' and no judgment on the opinions or thoughts behind those quotations. It seems a completely lost cause to defend this guy... [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 07:50, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
 
I would say that during the time Giuliani was a viable candidate, Huckabee was not, and this was when Robertson endorsed the former. As for this article being called a smear job, I think it's very good as it is, with just simple, trustworthy ''quotations'' and no judgment on the opinions or thoughts behind those quotations. It seems a completely lost cause to defend this guy... [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 07:50, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Marijuana ==
 +
 +
Anyone mind if I add a little bit about his current stance on marijuana? [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/us/pat-robertson-backs-legalizing-marijuana.html?_r=1&hp]
23

edits

Navigation menu