1,129
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 240:
Line 240: + + +
→Category: Anti-evolutionist?
*Not in someone else's house, Horace. That would be impolite. I am sure we agree far more than disagree, however since the more Wiki of you continue to act as if this is Wikipedia, or other Wiki's you have used, and treat everyone here like they are "Conservative", there will be little progress, and I assume that is what you, among others, want. Certainly my own experiences show me that. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
*Not in someone else's house, Horace. That would be impolite. I am sure we agree far more than disagree, however since the more Wiki of you continue to act as if this is Wikipedia, or other Wiki's you have used, and treat everyone here like they are "Conservative", there will be little progress, and I assume that is what you, among others, want. Certainly my own experiences show me that. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
=== Anti-evolutionist? ===
Is someone who is against Social Darwinism also an anti-evolutionist? How do you classify an astronomer who accepts stellar evolution but not biological evolution? Maxwell was saying that '''molecules''' do not evolve. That has nothing to do with biology. Any attempt to mix biological evolution and what Maxwell said is misleading. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT)