Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 bytes added ,  09:32, March 10, 2012
m
stylistics
Line 8: Line 8:  
|url=
 
|url=
 
|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7
 
|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7
−
|quote=Apart from the obvious fact that no one observed [the origin of the universe], scientists think of the Big Bang as a singularity in the past, an unrepeatable event;...}}</ref> and that has no ''natural'' explanation. Most frequently the term is used in connection with the origin of the [[universe]]. When scientific principles were first being developed into the [[scientific method]], scientists like [[Francis Bacon]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Isaac Newton]], and [[Lord Kelvin|William Kelvin]] distinguished between primary and secondary (''natural'') causes. A ''primary cause'' was a ''first cause'' to explain singularities.<ref name="skeptics">{{Cite book
+
|quote=Apart from the obvious fact that no one observed [the origin of the universe], scientists think of the Big Bang as a singularity in the past, an unrepeatable event;...}}</ref> and that has no ''natural'' explanation. Most frequently the term is used in connection with the origin of the [[universe]]. When scientific principles were first being developed into the [[scientific method]], scientists like [[Francis Bacon]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Isaac Newton]], and [[Lord Kelvin|William Kelvin]] distinguished between primary and secondary (''natural'') causes. A ''primary cause'' was meant to be a ''first cause'' to explain singularities.<ref name="skeptics">{{Cite book
 
   | author = Norman L. Geisler and Ronald M. Brooks
 
   | author = Norman L. Geisler and Ronald M. Brooks
 
   | year=1990
 
   | year=1990
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu