nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 249:
Line 249: + +
→Creationist?
TK, Andy <i>never said anything</i> about the <nowki>{{category:creationist}}</nowiki> tag. He spoke about the quote, which is still there. Ed Poor added the creationist tag originally and then tried to remove it, but you keep reverting it based on a misunderstanding of what Andy was talking about. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 23:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
TK, Andy <i>never said anything</i> about the <nowki>{{category:creationist}}</nowiki> tag. He spoke about the quote, which is still there. Ed Poor added the creationist tag originally and then tried to remove it, but you keep reverting it based on a misunderstanding of what Andy was talking about. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 23:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:*I think whenever any Sysop decides upon his own, or in consultation with users, to reverse any action by another Sysop, there isn't any misunderstanding, other than a total lack of respect. I think whenever any small group of users decides, on their own, to move categories or disambiguation pages, it shows an elitist and disrespectful attitude, as well. Such actions are no different, logically, than the high-handed attitude some of you complain about, in talking of the actions of a "certain Sysop", in my humble opinion. You gentlemen cannot have your cake, and eat it to, you know. Either the little clique of technocrats school the rest of us, or stop your unilateral actions without discussing it fully, and in public. Yes, this means whatever is considered "housekeeping" chores as well. Otherwise we are indeed acting elitist and self-centered, no? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:47, 9 April 2007 (EDT)