Changes

::Look, I am just trying to engage in the core business here.  I know you don't much like me and I know why.  Could we have a go at sorting this issue out?  I was saying that I was glad you were willing to discuss it.  Let's discuss it.  Why do you say he should be labelled a creationist? (or an anti-evolutionist for that matter)?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:04, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

::Look, I am just trying to engage in the core business here.  I know you don't much like me and I know why.  Could we have a go at sorting this issue out?  I was saying that I was glad you were willing to discuss it.  Let's discuss it.  Why do you say he should be labelled a creationist? (or an anti-evolutionist for that matter)?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:04, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

::*I am sorry if you actually think I dislike you, Horace, I am sure Ed or others would tell you that isn't true.  You know how to reach me, and until today, could also be reached on IRC, but I am done trying to meet people half way, because I was never afforded that.  If some here want to revel in their superior Wiki skills, they can do do.  I guess without sharing information it makes them feel superior, because I know whenever I haven't understood their intentions, I was called names, and worse.  It is enough for me that Andy says there isn't anything to support ''not'' calling him a Creationist. Since it is his place, and the matter, aside from the disrespect, a small matter in the order of the Univserse, I see no reason to do everything to the article but claim Andy is wrong, to strip it of that possibility. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 00:18, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

::*I am sorry if you actually think I dislike you, Horace, I am sure Ed or others would tell you that isn't true.  You know how to reach me, and until today, could also be reached on IRC, but I am done trying to meet people half way, because I was never afforded that.  If some here want to revel in their superior Wiki skills, they can do so.  I guess without sharing information it makes them feel superior, because I know whenever I haven't understood their intentions, I was called names, and worse.  It is enough for me that Andy says there isn't anything to support ''not'' calling him a Creationist. Since it is his place, and the matter, aside from the disrespect, a small matter in the order of the Univserse, I see no reason to do everything to the article but claim Andy is wrong, to strip it of that possibility. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 00:18, 10 April 2007 (EDT)