8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: +
no edit summary
Over 98% of scientists and a higher figure for biologists accept evolution. These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and know what they're talking about. Unlike your faith-based, unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence and there is NOT ONE peer-reviewed creationist scientific journal. Hmm... I wonder why? Could it be that the scientific community knows more than a bunch of idiots who keep denying Darwin when there is abundant evidence everywhere? --[[User:Jackmondoo23|Jackmondoo23]] 17:32, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
Over 98% of scientists and a higher figure for biologists accept evolution. These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and know what they're talking about. Unlike your faith-based, unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence and there is NOT ONE peer-reviewed creationist scientific journal. Hmm... I wonder why? Could it be that the scientific community knows more than a bunch of idiots who keep denying Darwin when there is abundant evidence everywhere? --[[User:Jackmondoo23|Jackmondoo23]] 17:32, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so. Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. By the way, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so. Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. By the way, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
: I don't care how much traction evolution has received among the public. Considering that 25% of the public think Obama is a foreigner, it is quite obvious that most of the public aren't exactly mentally advanced. You say global atheism is decreasing, '''state your source'''. Also, I have never heard of the '15 Q's', but I'm sure it's yet another creationist campaign that, like all creationist campaigns, are never taken seriously and end up forgotten about after a couple of months. I am an atheist, but before I give evidence for atheism, I want to know where you got the 'global atheism is shrinking' statistics from, because most polls suggest the opposite, at least for agnosticism anyway. --[[User:Jackmondoo23|Jackmondoo23]] 17:58, 18 March 2012 (EDT)