Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
352 bytes added ,  22:00, March 18, 2012
Line 64: Line 64:  
Over 98% of scientists and a higher figure for biologists accept evolution. These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and know what they're talking about. Unlike your faith-based, unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence and there is NOT ONE peer-reviewed creationist scientific journal. Hmm... I wonder why? Could it be that the scientific community knows more than a bunch of idiots who keep denying Darwin when there is abundant evidence everywhere? --[[User:Jackmondoo23|Jackmondoo23]] 17:32, 18 March 2012 (EDT)   
 
Over 98% of scientists and a higher figure for biologists accept evolution. These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and know what they're talking about. Unlike your faith-based, unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence and there is NOT ONE peer-reviewed creationist scientific journal. Hmm... I wonder why? Could it be that the scientific community knows more than a bunch of idiots who keep denying Darwin when there is abundant evidence everywhere? --[[User:Jackmondoo23|Jackmondoo23]] 17:32, 18 March 2012 (EDT)   
 
:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so.  Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. By the way, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:Jackmondoo, you seem frustrated that Darwinism hasn't gained far better traction in the world in terms of public acceptance - despite having 150 plus years to do so.  Given that [[global atheism]] is shrinking and is expected to shrink at an accelerated rate, the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] and the inability of Darwinists such as yourself to satisfactorily answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] things are not going to go better for Darwinism in terms of public acceptance and likely to grow much worse. By the way, are you an atheist? If so, do you have any proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
::By the way, the [[Journal of Creation]] and the [[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal]] are both peer reviewed journals. You failure to know this is despite them listed at this website is indicative of you engaging in sloppy due diligence or deceit (see: [[Atheism and deceit]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,907

edits

Navigation menu