Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
Talk:Law of Large Numbers (view source)
Revision as of 01:09, March 19, 2012
, 01:09, March 19, 2012No, I don't think microevolution entails random genetic drift. Perhaps you could define the term - if it means "evolution" as that term is traditionally understood, then it is not true for the same r
::Do you accept microevolution? I think your interpretation of law of large numbers disproves also microevolution. Regards, --[[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 19:40, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
::Do you accept microevolution? I think your interpretation of law of large numbers disproves also microevolution. Regards, --[[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 19:40, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
:::No, I don't think microevolution entails random genetic drift. Perhaps you could define the term - if it means "evolution" as that term is traditionally understood, then it is not true for the same reasons evolution is not.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:09, 18 March 2012 (EDT)