2,358
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: − +
toned down my statement a bit
==Case for Christ==
==Case for Christ==
I am reinserting the reference to ''Case for Christ''. It is not a "book review" to mention the book in one or two sentences. In fact, I think Conservapedia should serve as a jumping off point to further research on subjects, and that book is in itself a jumping off point to further research. I'm willing to take this up with the panel if necessary. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 01:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
I am reinserting the reference to ''Case for Christ''. It is not a "book review" to mention the book in one or two sentences. In fact, I think Conservapedia should serve as a jumping off point to further research on subjects, and that book is in itself a jumping off point to further research. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 01:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT)