17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Line 27:
Line 26: + +
Debate:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him. (view source)
Revision as of 05:17, April 10, 2007
, 05:17, April 10, 2007no edit summary
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
Giuliani is a Republican but as for social conservative issues, he is too liberal. He might be the Presidential nominee of our party. I kept asking myself, how could I vote for somebody pro-abortion and pro-gay rights? Then I heard a unique viewpoint I thought I should share. If we do not elect a President strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy, there might not be an America left to have abortions. I certainly want my child to grow up in a safe secure America. Giuliani is strong on defense, strong on national security and strong on foreign policy. In a time of war, this nation cannot afford to take chances with a Democrat President.
: Eljoe, I realize you are dead against Giuliani, so what, if he's the nominee, vote Clinton, what do I care. You are wrong is how I see it. I guess you speak for all the firefighters, even NYC ones that post good things about him on joinrudy.com Do I trust the firefighters union? They were the first union in America to give their backing to Kerry 'o4. Like I said, kerik is a non issue but except to you only. Keep tearing the man down, maybe we will have a better nominee, like your fav senior citizen McCain.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 14:30, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
: Eljoe, I realize you are dead against Giuliani, so what, if he's the nominee, vote Clinton, what do I care. You are wrong is how I see it. I guess you speak for all the firefighters, even NYC ones that post good things about him on joinrudy.com Do I trust the firefighters union? They were the first union in America to give their backing to Kerry 'o4. Like I said, kerik is a non issue but except to you only. Keep tearing the man down, maybe we will have a better nominee, like your fav senior citizen McCain.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 14:30, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
See this is the problem with the conservative republican voter right now, no attention to the quaility of the candidate, they'll turn a blind eye to all the candidate's faults as long as they are a brand name and Guiuliani is a brand name. He's done nothing since he was mayor in 2001 just ride his popularity from 9/11. He wants to spend federal money on abortion...no big deal, he's all for gay marriage...no big deal, his major endorsemnet to head Homeland Security to protect the US turns out to be a criminal...no big deal, decided to dodge Vietnam and avoid service to his country...no big deal. If thats the candidate you want, then you've already lost.--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:17, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
I would consider voting third party to send the Republican Party a message that they can't just nominate any old fool and expect me to vote lockstep for them. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:11, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
I would consider voting third party to send the Republican Party a message that they can't just nominate any old fool and expect me to vote lockstep for them. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:11, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
: Hey Dew, that's exactly the kind of thought process I am trying to prevent. Here is what your actions will dew. By sending a message to Republicans that you don't like it's leaders social positions, you are giving the Presidency to Hillary. Not only will she defend abortion rights, she will load the judicial system with pro-abortion supporters. On top of that, we will go back in time whereby we ignore terror and slash the military. We become laughingstock national security without a strong leader. The message you are sending is- come defeat America, the time is right. I guess your actions will have the desired affect- end abortions. Because nobody will be getting abortions during nuclear war!
: Hey Dew, that's exactly the kind of thought process I am trying to prevent. Here is what your actions will dew. By sending a message to Republicans that you don't like it's leaders social positions, you are giving the Presidency to Hillary. Not only will she defend abortion rights, she will load the judicial system with pro-abortion supporters. On top of that, we will go back in time whereby we ignore terror and slash the military. We become laughingstock national security without a strong leader. The message you are sending is- come defeat America, the time is right. I guess your actions will have the desired affect- end abortions. Because nobody will be getting abortions during nuclear war!