nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 274:
Line 274: − ::: I'm sorry, I thought discussion of this page belong on this talk page. Was I mistaken about that? I don't see how I've done anything but cooperate. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 01:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)+ + +
→Creationist?
*I clearly think that paragraph is "proof". I will now, since none of you like to cooperate, refer the article on "Creationism" to the Students to decide as well, so will be locking it. As for Ed, ask him. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:25, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
*I clearly think that paragraph is "proof". I will now, since none of you like to cooperate, refer the article on "Creationism" to the Students to decide as well, so will be locking it. As for Ed, ask him. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:25, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::I'm sorry, I thought discussion of this page belong on this talk page. Was I mistaken about that? I don't see how I've done anything but cooperate. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 01:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::*Well, I guess you wouldn't, given the number of times Andy and others, including me, said that sentence was "proof" for us. Who are you, any of you, to say your read is more valid? I can see from the insistence of others here, there cannot be any accommodation, because some of you insist only your interpretation is correct. So, I guess the Student Panel will decide. And, until people start to accommodate, and respect religious opinion, they will have to keep on deciding. Doesn't bother me in the least. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)