Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − + Line 63:
Line 63: − +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 02:29, March 22, 2012
, 02:29, March 22, 2012more clean-up
!Date of ''Conservapedia'' statement
!Date of ''Conservapedia'' statement
!''Conservapedia'' statement
!''Conservapedia'' statement
![[liberal]] response
![[liberal]] claptrap in response
!Result
!Result
!Date of Result
!Date of Result
|Dec. 22, 2008
|Dec. 22, 2008
|the theory of [[man-made global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227</ref>
|the theory of [[man-made global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&oldid=592227</ref>
| Insist there is an overwhelming consensus in scientific community on the issue. They point to data like a survey of 1,372 climate researchers that found 97-98% agreed that anthropogenic climate change was real.<ref>http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html</reF>
|"The science is settled" that rapid [[global warming]] is somehow occurring, despite much evidence to the contrary.
|Frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "[[climate change]]."
|Frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to "[[climate change]]."
|2011
|2011