| − | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup (although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right) , even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include: | + | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven wrong on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup (although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally right]], but usually about major matters and even then it is usually mostly wrong) , even for predictions that some [[conservatives]] have ridiculed. Examples include: |