Changes

The point here is that if we want to be a credible website we should call things by their proper names.  If you want to make the point that Wikipedia is waky or biased or whatever, do it in the body of the article.  I think that if Wikipedia had an article on Conservapedia, but called it Conserva'''stupid'''ia, you would not like it, and would probably include it in your list of Wikipedia bias. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 11:56, 6 January 2007 (EST)

The point here is that if we want to be a credible website we should call things by their proper names.  If you want to make the point that Wikipedia is waky or biased or whatever, do it in the body of the article.  I think that if Wikipedia had an article on Conservapedia, but called it Conserva'''stupid'''ia, you would not like it, and would probably include it in your list of Wikipedia bias. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 11:56, 6 January 2007 (EST)

I TOTALLY agree with Tim,

I TOTALLY agree with Tim,

'''Reply''':  If we call it "Wackypedia we hurt our own credibility.  If we have a valid poit to make, we can make it without resorting to "personal attacks." (For lack of a better term)  It is just acting immature to use namecalling instead of logic or truth to make our point.  --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 10:56, 8 January 2007 (EST)

'''Reply''':  If we call it "Wackypedia we hurt our own credibility.  If we have a valid poit to make, we can make it without resorting to "personal attacks." (For lack of a better term)  It is just acting immature to use namecalling instead of logic or truth to make our point.  --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 10:56, 8 January 2007 (EST)

==Gossip and vulgarity==

==Gossip and vulgarity==