18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 139:
Line 139: +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 14:52, March 27, 2012
, 14:52, March 27, 2012→What a creationist would reply
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===
This is an example of evolutionists "moving the goalposts," so to speak. Natural selection was considered an adequate explanation for evolution until ID pointed out the flaws of that theory. Instead of humbly accepting that their theory is flawed, however, evolutionists merely claim that their theory never said such a thing, and give a new contrived guess at what evolution is. [[User:OllieB|OllieB]] 10:52, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
==How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?==
==How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?==