Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by JoshuaB (talk) to last revision by SamCoulter
Line 48: Line 48:  
I am not convinced that the real Fidel Castro is dead. With that said, to assume it is him and not question it, is to remain closed-minded and spoon-fed. Secretive groups like Communists, I think the phrase is Trust but Verify. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:41, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
 
I am not convinced that the real Fidel Castro is dead. With that said, to assume it is him and not question it, is to remain closed-minded and spoon-fed. Secretive groups like Communists, I think the phrase is Trust but Verify. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:41, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:Agreed. It's certainly ''possible'' that Castro is dead and it would be closed-minded to rule it out completely, but let's face it: there's no actual reason to think he is and for a dead guy he's not exactly been shy about his public appearances the last couple of years. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 14:52, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
 
:Agreed. It's certainly ''possible'' that Castro is dead and it would be closed-minded to rule it out completely, but let's face it: there's no actual reason to think he is and for a dead guy he's not exactly been shy about his public appearances the last couple of years. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 14:52, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
  −
== Mysteries abound... ==
  −
[[Image:ASchlafly.JPG|thumb|left|A verified photo of the real Andy Schlafly]]
  −
[[Image:Img524 Andy.jpg|thumb|left|A photo of someone alleging to be Andy Schlafly at Columbia University]]
  −
Notice how in the second photo that the purported Schlafly is thinner, graying, and looks more like Bill Nye the Science Guy than the real Andy Schlafly. How long has this imposter been running Conservapedia? Were liberals so desperate to silence the truth of Conservapedia that they had poor Andy taken out and this crude stand-in has been left in his place? As further proof, look as the purported "Andy's" editing pattern recently. The fake Andy makes wild unsubstantiated claims that fly in the face of science and common sense, is this a ploy to discredit Conservapedia? --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 15:04, 29 March 2012 (EDT)
 
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu