Changes

{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:13, 29 March 2012 (EDT)}}

{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:13, 29 March 2012 (EDT)}}

After attempting to contribute meaningful and factual edits to wikipedia, I have become very disappointed with the strong pro-abortion bias that so permeates most of the editors.  Strong scientific evidence pointing out well-documented harms and risks associated with abortion and contraception, is quickly removed since "it is not the consensus opinion of experts."  Such individuals can only be considered experts, I've learned, if they share the same radical and biasedd pro-abortion ideology.

After attempting to contribute meaningful and factual edits to wikipedia, I have become very disappointed with the strong pro-abortion bias that so permeates most of the editors.  Strong scientific evidence pointing out well-documented harms and risks associated with abortion and contraception is quickly removed since "it is not the consensus opinion of experts."  Such individuals can only be considered experts, I've learned, if they share the same radical and biased pro-abortion ideology.

I discovered conservapedia when reading another user's talk about similar experiences

I discovered conservapedia when reading another user's talk about similar experiences

[[User:Frankgyn|Frankgyn]] 15:13, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

[[User:Frankgyn|Frankgyn]] 15:13, 29 March 2012 (EDT)