Changes

::::::Yes, it would be absolutely preposterous. In fact his energy would have increased by a number of foot-pounds equal to one pound times ''c''² in feet per second. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 21:11, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

::::::Yes, it would be absolutely preposterous. In fact his energy would have increased by a number of foot-pounds equal to one pound times ''c''² in feet per second. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 21:11, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

:::::::To explain that further, his energy would have increased in proportion to his '''weight''', not to the speed of light. If a person who weighed 150lb gained 1lb the energy contained in their mass would increase from 1.4467x10¹⁷ ft lb to 1.4564x10¹⁷ ft lb. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 21:39, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

:::::::To explain that further, his energy would have increased in proportion to his '''weight''', not to the speed of light. If a person who weighed 150lb gained 1lb the energy contained in their mass would increase from 1.4467x10¹⁷ ft lb to 1.4564x10¹⁷ ft lb. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 21:39, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

== Bare links ==

== Bare links ==

I noticed that [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&diff=971455&oldid=971446 this edit] removed publication information about the references.  Personally, I think this information is useful for two reasons: it helps Conservapedia editors locate the references from other sources if (and when) the links go dead, and it helps who print out Conservapedia articles and wish to look up the references offline.  (Of course, I'm not suggesting that the URLs be removed, but this could be in addition to the publication information).  Of course, there may be perfectly good reasons for removing the publication information of which I am not aware, but I otherwise think that the publication information should be included again (and I plan to do this once the protection expires).  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:17, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

I noticed that [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&diff=971455&oldid=971446 this edit] removed publication information about the references.  Personally, I think this information is useful for two reasons: it helps Conservapedia editors locate the references from other sources if (and when) the links go dead, and it helps who print out Conservapedia articles and wish to look up the references offline.  (Of course, I'm not suggesting that the URLs be removed, but this could be in addition to the publication information).  Of course, there may be perfectly good reasons for removing the publication information of which I am not aware, but I otherwise think that the publication information should be included again (and I plan to do this once the protection expires).  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:17, 30 March 2012 (EDT)