2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 462:
Line 462: + + + +
→Other countries: new section
::::::I hadn't noticed the others, thanks for the heads up. Shall I remove this section? It seems unnecessary. --[[User:Swinefish|Swinefish]] 23:07, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
::::::I hadn't noticed the others, thanks for the heads up. Shall I remove this section? It seems unnecessary. --[[User:Swinefish|Swinefish]] 23:07, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
:::::::You can leave it. You redefining a fallacy and it being pointed out was useful. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:31, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
:::::::You can leave it. You redefining a fallacy and it being pointed out was useful. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:31, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
== Other countries ==
Rather contrary to the rather limited 'studies' that this article bases its claims off, I think it'd be most logical to conclude that atheism is inversely proportional to obesity, when you consider the USA has one of the highest (if not the highest) obesity rates in the Western world, and also happens to be the most religious.
== Other countries ==
== Other countries ==
Rather contrary to the rather limited 'studies' that this article bases its claims off, I think it'd be most logical to conclude that atheism is inversely proportional to obesity, when you consider the USA has one of the highest (if not the highest) obesity rates in the Western world, and also happens to be the most religious.
Rather contrary to the rather limited 'studies' that this article bases its claims off, I think it'd be most logical to conclude that atheism is inversely proportional to obesity, when you consider the USA has one of the highest (if not the highest) obesity rates in the Western world, and also happens to be the most religious.