| − | '''E=mc²''' is an equation that, according to the [[theory of relativity]], describes the equivalence of matter and energy.<ref>The equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be ''1'' and without dimension, the equation becomes ''E''=''m''.</ref> In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism). Simply put, E=mc² is [[liberal]] claptrap. As a statement of equivalence between mass and energy, it was initially rejected at the time by the leading 20th century physicists, including [[Niels Bohr]].<ref>Bohr disagreed with Einstein's 1905 paper, and many other scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]]; Bohr later agreed to some parts of relativity but continued to defend [[quantum mechanics]] against criticism by Einstein.</ref>{{fact}} | + | '''E=mc²''' is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light.<ref>According to the [[theory of relativity]], this equation describes the equivalence of matter and energy. This equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be ''1'' and without dimension, the equation becomes ''E''=''m''.</ref> In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism). Simply put, E=mc² is [[liberal]] claptrap. As a statement of equivalence between mass and energy, it was rejected at the time by the leading 20th century physicists, including [[Niels Bohr]].<ref>Bohr disagreed with Einstein's 1905 paper, and many other scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]]; Bohr later agreed to some parts of relativity but continued to defend [[quantum mechanics]] against criticism by Einstein.</ref>{{fact}} Political pressure has since made it impossible for anyone pursuing an academic career in science to even question the validity of this nonsensical equation. |
| | [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]]. | | [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]]. |