SkipCaptcha
265
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 25:
Line 25: − + − I note that anyone using a GPS is relying on the Theory of Relativity being true, since calculations derived from Relativity are used within a GPS.+ − [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 18:32, 5 April 2012 (EDT)+ − :''Conservapedia'' seeks the truth, not merely what the [[lamestream media]] claim is the truth. Moreover, once one accepts a logical fallacy, then anything false can be proven from it.+
→Why does Conservapedia seek to discredit Relativity: Split topic, will think about a response for a few days.
Can someone explain why Conservapedia is so opposed to the Theory of Relativity?
Can someone explain why Conservapedia is so opposed to the Theory of Relativity?
Is there some philosophical or conservative/liberal basis for this opposition?
Is there some philosophical or conservative/liberal basis for this opposition? [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 18:32, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
:''Conservapedia'' seeks the truth, not merely what the [[lamestream media]] claim is the truth. Moreover, once one accepts a logical fallacy, then anything false can be proven from it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:34, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
== GPS and Relativity ==
I note that anyone using a GPS is relying on the Theory of Relativity being true, since calculations derived from Relativity are used within a GPS. [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 18:32, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
:GPS does '''''not''''' rely on the [[Theory of Relativity]], and this has been thoroughly explained on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:34, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
:GPS does '''''not''''' rely on the [[Theory of Relativity]], and this has been thoroughly explained on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:34, 5 April 2012 (EDT)