Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,334 bytes added ,  04:46, April 8, 2012
→‎Errors: Jesus Christ was no less truthful simply because he was (and is) controversial.
Line 119: Line 119:     
[[User:Elproof|Elproof]] 19:45, 7 April 2012 (EDT)
 
[[User:Elproof|Elproof]] 19:45, 7 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:These are nitpicky points, and I don't see why any of them would require any changes to the entry.  I address each point:
 +
 +
::(1) Your comment complains about the definition, but does not offer a better one.  Instead, your comment says the definition is "vague", but then uses even vaguer terminology like "heavy machinery" or whether "a bright high-schooler could follow it."
 +
 +
::(2) Your comment that "less rigorous" should be replaced by "less controversial" would, again, be a step in the wrong direction.  "Controversy" does not delineate limits on truth.  [[Jesus Christ]] was no less truthful simply because he was (and is) controversial.
 +
 +
::(3) This point is silly and does not merit a response.
 +
 +
::(4) It's obviously not the number of assumptions that matter, but the lack of rigor in the assumptions made.  Assuming that there is a unique square root of -1 is a highly non-rigorous, even implausible, assumption underlying complex analysis.
 +
 +
::(5) "but elementary proofs are not always preferred ..." by whom?  One doesn't allow a fox to guard a henhouse, and neither mathematicians nor politicians should be setting their own rules as they go, or else before long all sorts of nonsensical "proofs" might be asserted by some academics at [[liberal]] institutions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:46, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Navigation menu