Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 184: Line 184:     
::: Why do you say "assumes"? All of those properties are provable from either of the above two definitions of the complex numbers. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:20, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
 
::: Why do you say "assumes"? All of those properties are provable from either of the above two definitions of the complex numbers. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:20, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Really, that one is obvious: x²+1=0 ⇒ x³ = x(x²+1-1)=x(-1)=-x No further assumptions are needed, only basic algebra.... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:05, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu