Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Elementary proof (view source)

Revision as of 21:39, April 8, 2012

227 bytes added ,  21:39, April 8, 2012
→‎Unique square root of -1 necessary for complex analysis: If something could be "defined to exist," then we could simply define "God to exist, let's call Him g," and that would end any debate
Line 179: Line 179:     
:::Really, that one is obvious: x²+1=0 ⇒ x³ = x(x²+1-1)=x(-1)=-x No further assumptions are needed, only basic algebra.... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:05, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:::Really, that one is obvious: x²+1=0 ⇒ x³ = x(x²+1-1)=x(-1)=-x No further assumptions are needed, only basic algebra.... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:05, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::If something could be "defined to exist," then we could simply define "God to exist, let's call Him '''''g'''''," and that would end any debate about the matter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:39, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/974385"

Navigation menu