Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎GPSandRelativity: the burden of proof is on anyone who claims that the Theory of Relativity was used to design GPS. That burden includes describing who, when, where, how&why. It didn't happen.
Line 62: Line 62:  
:I'm afraid that Aschlafly won't come up with ''some actual references (not quotes from) which state that relativity is not used in GPS'' as there aren't any.  
 
:I'm afraid that Aschlafly won't come up with ''some actual references (not quotes from) which state that relativity is not used in GPS'' as there aren't any.  
 
:[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:53, 6 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:53, 6 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Folks, the burden of proof is on anyone who claims that the [[Theory of Relativity]] was used to design GPS.  That burden includes describing who, when, where, how, and why.  It didn't happen.  And if it did, the person who wasted time and money on such a frivolous approach should explain the mistake, because engineers can simply synchronize the clocks far more accurately than the theory ever could.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:15, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu