| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''E=mc²''' is an equation that, according to the [[theory of relativity]], describes the equivalence of matter and energy. Andy doesn't understand it because he is a freaking retard, so he pretends it is some kind of liberal conspiracy rather than admit he is an idiot. | + | '''E=mc²''' is an equation that, according to the [[theory of relativity]], describes the equivalence of matter and energy.<ref>According to the [[theory of relativity]], this equation describes the equivalence of matter and energy. This equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be ''1'' and without dimension, the equation becomes ''E''=''m''.</ref> In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism). Simply put, E=mc² is [[liberal]] claptrap. As a statement of equivalence between mass and energy, it was rejected at the time by the leading 20th century physicists, including [[Niels Bohr]].<ref>Some scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]]; Bohr used the Theory of Relativity to defend [[quantum mechanics]] against criticism by Einstein.</ref>{{fact}} Political pressure has since made it impossible for anyone pursuing an academic career in science to even question the validity of this nonsensical equation.{{fact}} |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Mass]] is a measure of an object's inertia, in other words its resistance to acceleration. In contrast, the intrinsic [[energy]] of an object (such as an [[atom]]) is a function of electrostatic charge and other non-inertial forces, having nothing to do with gravity. Declaring the object's energy to be a function of inertia rather than electrostatics is an absurd and impossible attempt to unify the forces of nature, contrary to [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | For more than a century, the claim that '''E=mc²''' has never yielded anything of value. Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the [[lamestream media]]. There have been attempts to find some justification for the equation in already understood processes involved in [[nuclear power]] generation and [[nuclear weapon]]s, and in the speculation about [[antimatter]].<ref>[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/legacy-of-e-equals-mc2.html Peter Tyson ''The Legacy of E=mc²''] October 11, 2005. PBS ''NOVA''. </ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | The [[Theory of Relativity]] has never been able to mathematically derive '''E=mc²''' from first principles, and a physicist observed in a peer-reviewed paper published in 2011 that "a rigorous proof of the mass-energy equivalence is probably beyond the purview of the special theory."<ref>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AmJPh..79..591H Eugene Hecht: ''How Einstein confirmed E<sub>0</sub>=mc²'', American Journal of Physics, Volume 79, Issue 6, pp. 591-600 (2011)]</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | It has been known for a long time that radiation has a mass equivalence, which was correctly derived by [[Henri Poincare]] in 1904,<ref>[http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?uri=josa-42-8-540 Herbert E. Ives ''Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation'', JOSA, Vol. 42, Issue 8, pp. 540-543 (1952)]</ref> but the equation '''E=mc²''' makes a claim far beyond that limited circumstance: |
| | + | |
| | + | {{cquote|The equality of the mass equivalent of radiation to the mass lost by a radiating body is derivable from Poincaré’s momentum of radiation (1900) and his principle of relativity (1904).|||Herbert Ives, 1952}} |
| | | | |
| | == Description for the layman == | | == Description for the layman == |