Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes removed ,  01:26, April 10, 2012
whoops
Line 9: Line 9:  
Proponents trumpet any paper concerning the subject that achieves peer review in any venue whatsoever, as if "peer reviewed" meant "solid verified and settled science" rather than "not-obviously-wrong request for comment." Proponents advocate cold fusion as an alternative energy source with imminent practical utility, despite the aforementioned lack of reproducibility. At the same time, proponents try to blame their lack of success on persecution from the establishment. The theories proposed to explain the supposed effect, outlined in the 2010 review, are little more than contrived rationalizations of the claimed observations. When considered in the context of what is already known about physics and chemistry, they border on the nonsensical. There is a continuing failure to find a setup that consistently (nearly 100% of the time) reproduces the supposed effect. The great majority of written-up experiments fail even to obtain excess heat.
 
Proponents trumpet any paper concerning the subject that achieves peer review in any venue whatsoever, as if "peer reviewed" meant "solid verified and settled science" rather than "not-obviously-wrong request for comment." Proponents advocate cold fusion as an alternative energy source with imminent practical utility, despite the aforementioned lack of reproducibility. At the same time, proponents try to blame their lack of success on persecution from the establishment. The theories proposed to explain the supposed effect, outlined in the 2010 review, are little more than contrived rationalizations of the claimed observations. When considered in the context of what is already known about physics and chemistry, they border on the nonsensical. There is a continuing failure to find a setup that consistently (nearly 100% of the time) reproduces the supposed effect. The great majority of written-up experiments fail even to obtain excess heat.
 
===Examples===
 
===Examples===
Entrepreneur and inventor Andrea Rossi has announced the E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer), a device claimed to generate kilowatt-level heat from nickel and hydrogen. Rossi has explained this as involving the transmutation of nickel into copper,<ref><ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/the_nuclear_physics_of_why_we.php The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold Fusion Claims Collapse] (Peter Thieberger and Ethan Siegel, ''Starts With A Bang!'', 2001-12-05)</ref> a reaction so ridiculously unfeasible it doesn't occur even in supernovae. Demonstrations of Rossi's devices have been controversial and insufficient details have been released for independent third-party verification. The claimed reaction has not been supported by independent observers, even by a physicist (Sven Kullander) who has supported the claims of excess heat. Even cold fusion proponents are skeptical of Rossi's claims.
+
Entrepreneur and inventor Andrea Rossi has announced the E-Cat (Energy Catalyzer), a device claimed to generate kilowatt-level heat from nickel and hydrogen. Rossi has explained this as involving the transmutation of nickel into copper,<ref>http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/the_nuclear_physics_of_why_we.php The Physics of why the e-Cat's Cold Fusion Claims Collapse] (Peter Thieberger and Ethan Siegel, ''Starts With A Bang!'', 2001-12-05)</ref> a reaction so ridiculously unfeasible it doesn't occur even in supernovae. Demonstrations of Rossi's devices have been controversial and insufficient details have been released for independent third-party verification. The claimed reaction has not been supported by independent observers, even by a physicist (Sven Kullander) who has supported the claims of excess heat. Even cold fusion proponents are skeptical of Rossi's claims.
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
72

edits

Navigation menu